<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Business 2.0 Void?</title>
	<link>http://www.digitalphocus.com/2007/09/08/business-20-void/</link>
	<description>"Focused on the Business of the Web"</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Steven Fransblow</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalphocus.com/2007/09/08/business-20-void/#comment-11284</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 20:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.digitalphocus.com/2007/09/08/business-20-void/#comment-11284</guid>
					<description>Brendan,

Personally, I dropped my Business 2.0 subscription a year ago - I found that I would read the magazine and never learn anything new. They did a good job highlighting some innovative companies and obscure topics - but it read too much like a press release with no depth. I find the same thing with Businessweek sometimes too. These days, the monday Boston Globe business section on Innovation fills that void for me locally with the WSJ kicking up the rest.

I'd say lets start something in this area, but I remember the old Red Herring (which I heard was revived) and now Business 2.0 is dead... just a hard nut to crack I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brendan,</p>
<p>Personally, I dropped my Business 2.0 subscription a year ago - I found that I would read the magazine and never learn anything new. They did a good job highlighting some innovative companies and obscure topics - but it read too much like a press release with no depth. I find the same thing with Businessweek sometimes too. These days, the monday Boston Globe business section on Innovation fills that void for me locally with the WSJ kicking up the rest.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say lets start something in this area, but I remember the old Red Herring (which I heard was revived) and now Business 2.0 is dead&#8230; just a hard nut to crack I guess.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: zorlu</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalphocus.com/2007/09/08/business-20-void/#comment-11282</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.digitalphocus.com/2007/09/08/business-20-void/#comment-11282</guid>
					<description>I think blogs will continue to be the dominating info banks for professionals like us. However it is so unfortunatet that we won't have business 2.0 anymore. I truly enjoyed reading some of its stories. I think there has to be a new magazine to fill the void since i Believe that the editorial flavor of business 2.0 was different than wired or fortunes or businessweek, but the questions is that who would want to do it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think blogs will continue to be the dominating info banks for professionals like us. However it is so unfortunatet that we won&#8217;t have business 2.0 anymore. I truly enjoyed reading some of its stories. I think there has to be a new magazine to fill the void since i Believe that the editorial flavor of business 2.0 was different than wired or fortunes or businessweek, but the questions is that who would want to do it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
